Old Spice has one of the most successful advertisement
campaigns. Its most recent
editions feature wide receiver Wes Welker. This serves two purposes. It gives Old Spice a famous sponsor in Welker. It also connects Old Spice to the sport
of football, which is a manly sport.
Old Spice always tries to portray this manly theme. They sell men’s grooming products. Since it is a brand purely to be used
by men they take this theme and run with it associating itself with
manliness. These current
commercials come with the beginning of the season, taking advantage of a
current situation. One of the
commercial feature Wes playing well, taking a long shower at half time and
missing the second half. This
shows their connection with humor also.
This is an attention grabber.
Since there is not much logically that can set apart types of body
washes Old Spice uses these right brain techniques to get and keep watchers
attention. These Old Spice commercials
work well because they have such a specific audience and direct these
advertisements at this audience with commercials that would likely not appeal
on a wider scale. What this means
is that the commercials directly try to be manly and funny. Since Old Spice knows its possible clientele
are men they do not have to try to appeal to women. For this reason they can directly advertize for men, making
their ads manly and funny, because these are the ideas that work the best with
men. Men want to be manly and
funny and football players are manly and the commercials are funny so people
think that if they use Old Spice they would be manly also and funny. This works well because they have been
doing well since the original campaign of this type came out.
Sunday, October 27, 2013
Sunday, October 20, 2013
TOW 5: Are Chicks Brighter Than Babies? by Nicholas D. Kristof
Many articles talk about how unjust veal is, and law
enforcement delivers punishment for the mishandling of cats and dogs, but it is
not easy to find arguments against the maltreatment of poultry. In the case of Are Chicks Brighter Than Babies? Kristof does.
Nicholas Kristof has experience with the farming of poultry. Before graduating from Harvard and
becoming an award winning journalist he grew up on a sheep and cherry
farm. He uses an anecdote from
this time as a method of getting his point across. He talks about the relationships between geese and how when
he would take one to the chopping block its mate would follow. This short story really helps his
article along because it shows his experience along with getting the readers’
emotions going. Kristof also uses
the assistance of the time, right after a salmonella outbreak, as another
assistor. He uses it as a lead
saying that it is not the only reason not to eat chicken as well as using its
attention to springboard his idea and have it start as a more important piece. The last technique that Kristof uses is
to talk about the animals in reference to how smart they are. He talks about how they can count and
how they are even about as smart as toddlers. This is in an effort to appeal again to people’s emotions
due to the fact that they feel as if the animals are more important if they are
smarter. All of these methods work
in convincing his more middle aged audience of his purpose. The fact that although it is not bad to
eat poultry from time to time it is important to realize where they are coming
from and that they are not the idiots that we take them to be.
Sunday, October 13, 2013
TOW 4: What's Wrong With Matt by Sage Rosenfels
In light of Matt Schaubs recent failures as quarterback of
the Huston Texans, Sage Rosenfels shares perspective from his experience at the
position. Sage Rosenfel played in
the NFL for eleven years, two of them in Huston with Schaub. In his times he had similar problems to
Schaub although over the course of his career he was mainly a backup. From this experience he talks about
what is wrong with Schaub and what is to blame for his week start. He chalks another one up to mental
pressure saying that once a player starts to mess up the problems snowball
until it is almost impossible to recover.
He addresses all of these facts in an effort to show many, likely male,
big time football fans, or atleast Huston fans, a new view of what is
happening. With the quick drop in
Schaub’s skill level from one year to the next, throwing three quarters of the
picks of last year in less then one fifth of the games, many questions are
quickly raised, one of the biggest being should Huston start on the quarterback
search. Although not trying to
take a position on the issue, Rosenfels offers many opinions on the issue
including the fact that he does not think there really is an issue with
Schaub. Rosenfels appeals to his
own experience I an effort to help him prove his point. Rosenfels speaks on how, during his
second season with the Texans, he fell into a rut. During his first start of four that season he lost the game
in the final few minutes based partly on an aggressive dive followed by two
pics. After that he was unable to
regain his confidence, making his year hell. This technique really helps him get across his point because
it shows he knows what he is doing because he has been there before. This shows that he is one of a small
number of people with the experience to talk giving him the right to speak.
Sunday, October 6, 2013
TOW Post 3: Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell
In the book Outliers
Malcolm Gladwell aims to shift his readers view on what truly makes people
successful. He offers many
different views on different “outliers” from simple junior hockey players to
the greats of the Beetles. He
points out little know facts about these people which help to craft them into
the characters they become, and share how those small details on the side are
the true contributors to the lives they ended up living. Gladwell is an incarnation of his own
idea of 10,000 hours. He has been
working as a journalist at the New Yorker for almost two decades and is now
coming out with his fifth book this year and it looks to be as big a hit as his
first four. His first two books
have sales in the millions and has had his writings named some of the best
non-fiction works. He does have an
odd writing style however. All of
his ideas come in the form of anecdotes.
Gladwell likes to tell short stories of the ideas that exemplify his
points so that it is not simply an abstract idea but one that is demonstrated
by real people, some of them even being household names. This style of writing really helps him
in getting his ideas across to his reader. By giving examples for his points he can ground his ideas
not in abstract language but something that a reader could go out and look
up. Gladwell also does a good job
of diversifying his stories, talking about anything from athleticism, in hockey,
to computer programmers, in Bill Joy, to the biggest billionaires the world has
ever seen, like Rockefeller. The
issue with this style though is that it has gained a lot of criticism. It has been critiqued because it only
shows small ideas to prove a bigger point. Many people further criticize Gladwell simply because he is
a journalist and not a scientist.
No matter what the criticism however Gladwell continues to write
interesting pieces with different ideas, and Outliers is no outlier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)