Many articles talk about how unjust veal is, and law
enforcement delivers punishment for the mishandling of cats and dogs, but it is
not easy to find arguments against the maltreatment of poultry. In the case of Are Chicks Brighter Than Babies? Kristof does.
Nicholas Kristof has experience with the farming of poultry. Before graduating from Harvard and
becoming an award winning journalist he grew up on a sheep and cherry
farm. He uses an anecdote from
this time as a method of getting his point across. He talks about the relationships between geese and how when
he would take one to the chopping block its mate would follow. This short story really helps his
article along because it shows his experience along with getting the readers’
emotions going. Kristof also uses
the assistance of the time, right after a salmonella outbreak, as another
assistor. He uses it as a lead
saying that it is not the only reason not to eat chicken as well as using its
attention to springboard his idea and have it start as a more important piece. The last technique that Kristof uses is
to talk about the animals in reference to how smart they are. He talks about how they can count and
how they are even about as smart as toddlers. This is in an effort to appeal again to people’s emotions
due to the fact that they feel as if the animals are more important if they are
smarter. All of these methods work
in convincing his more middle aged audience of his purpose. The fact that although it is not bad to
eat poultry from time to time it is important to realize where they are coming
from and that they are not the idiots that we take them to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment