Student interest for jobs with a science and math base has
dropped in recent years although these are the markets in which jobs have
increased the most. In the piece Who Says Math has to be Boring the Editorial
Board for the New York Times make an argument of policy that the educational
system in America needs to be altered in order to help fix this issue. This Editorial Board is made up of 19
journalist of the New York Times who all has differing backgrounds in an effort
to write well rounded articles. This article includes four separate ideas in how to better
equip students for the world and how to make their abilities and view of math
and science better. These four
ways are a more flexible curriculum, earlier start with numbers, better-prepared
teachers, and experience in the real world. All of these ideas are separate and could work at fixing the
issue on their own but would work even better together. This article is also likely targeted to
a more educated audience likely interested in politics or with a strong opinion
about how the current education system is being run in an effort to spur them
to think that there are flaws but there are simple ways to fix these
issues. One way the authors try to
get this across is by clearly making a distinction between each idea. Each idea is even made into separate categories
and individually talked about to an extent. This allows the readers to make clear divisions about each
idea and think about them with a new mind as each new solution arises. This also makes sure that the reader
knows which idea is which and does not blur the lines between suggested
solutions thinking that one thing may be under another.
No comments:
Post a Comment